| “Who
is this nutball?” asks a Gotham City police officer
after the diabolical Mr. Freeze makes an appearance.
Comically absurd dialogue aside, that nutball would
be Arnold Schwarzenegger, the star of the fourth Batman
film, Batman and Robin. Arnold gets billed above George
Clooney, who replaces Val Kilmer as the legendary Dark
Knight. Sadly, however, no one replaced director Joel
Schumacher, who has once again completely destroyed
three new Batman villains, as well as further running
the franchise into the ground.
Gotham City is under attack from a maddened scientist
who has an insatiable thirst for the cold. Using an
unfathomably powerful ice gun amongst other subzero
devices, self-named Mr. Freeze (Arnold Schwarzenegger)
wreaks havoc on the town, stealing valuable diamonds
for use in both his armor and in a plot to freeze the
entire city. Joining him is Dr. Pamela Easley (Uma Thurman)
who is unexplainably transformed into the lusty yet
venomous Poison Ivy, a woman bent on using Mother Nature
to destroy the world. She is also accompanied by Bane,
a ruthless convict who is pumped up with steroids and
venom for unmatched physical strength.
Meanwhile, Batman (George Clooney) must deal with Robin’s
(Chris O’Donnell) constant nagging about teamwork
and his poor decisions. Batman has difficulty trusting
anyone, and Robin’s complaining doesn’t
seem to help. Faithful butler Alfred (Michael Gough)
becomes sick, and his niece Barbara Wilson (Alicia Silverstone)
drops by for a visit, only to cause more troubles for
Batman and Robin.
It doesn’t seem to matter to fans, who keep pumping
money into the series, no matter how ridiculous it gets.
The neon lights, fluorescent face paint, and lavish
costumes all return for another round of unspeakably
cheesy superhero action, and not even the introduction
of Batgirl can help save it – especially not the
introduction of Batgirl.
Similar to the downward transition of James Bond (from
Sean Connery to Roger Moore), in which many fans were
less than thrilled with Moore’s tongue-in-cheek
attitude, Batman has become dependent on droll one-liners
and unnecessary comedy to dispatch the baddies. Before
every fight, every attack, every push of a button, and
every retaliation is a dreadfully effete one-liner quip,
oftentimes delivered by multiple characters. Not only
is the dialogue hopelessly pathetic, the villains have
to speak in lengthy monologues just to keep the audience
aware of their schemes.
Apparently unable to create interesting or new geneses
for the villains, Mr. Freeze is introduced exactly like
Two-Face in the previous film, and is surrounded by
nonstop unbelievable elements. So is Poison Ivy, who
without explanation has poisonous lips, a flashy wardrobe
designer, and Leia Organa’s hairstylist. Her introduction
exactly duplicates The Riddler’s appearance from
Batman Forever. The third villain, Bane, is reduced
to little more than Frankenstein’s monster, and
Batgirl couldn’t have been more unnecessary. Her
annoying prying, inconsideracy and daredevil ways lead
to constant irritation – not aid. Perhaps most
disheartening of all, however, is the fact that every
character in the film defies gravity, physics and any
form of logic.
Batman and Robin’s design manages to rip off
A Clockwork Orange, Mad Max, Star Wars, and Cirque Du
Soleil, amongst others (need I mention the Batman Visa
Card?). Every time the heroes get into a harrowing situation,
they conveniently have a device readily available to
save themselves – or the camera cuts away and
we have to assume they got out alive. This is one of
those films that begs for Mystery Science Theater 3000
commentary from the audience, and ensures that Batman
will need a complete makeover in order to ever be taken
seriously again.
- Mike Massie
Click
HERE to read reviews of Batman, Batman Returns, Batman
Forever, Batman & Robin, Batman Begins, Batman:
The Dark Knight and MORE!
|
2 is a bit low. It was bad, but it wasn't atrocious. I liked it better than Batman Returns.